Do you think that The Conduit deserved a higher or lower score then 8.6?

Do you think so? I think they deserve a higher one: 8.9.

http://wii.ign.com/articles/996/996847p1.html

While it was good, I agree that they should have scored it to at least a 9.0. But it's still a great and detailed review.

I think it should have gotten a little higher, but I'll have to play to find out.

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:While it was good, I agree that they should have scored it to at least a 9.0. But it's still a great and detailed review.

I know . At least it earned a Editors Choice.

Link wrote:

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:While it was good, I agree that they should have scored it to at least a 9.0. But it's still a great and detailed review.

I know . At least it earned a Editors Choice.

That's great news!

I know right, I've played editor's choice games, they are usually really good. But I guess that's why its editor's choice.

And you know what, they actually said the storyline was good! I'm very happy about that. This review has made my day. All the things they criticized were things HVS will probably fix in TC 2.

Yes! (as Captain Falcon says it)

Levi wrote:I know right, I've played editor's choice games, they are usually really good. But I guess that's why its editor's choice.

And you know what, they actually said the storyline was good! I'm very happy about that. This review has made my day. All the things they criticized were things HVS will probably fix in TC 2.

Yes! (as Captain Falcon says it)

Expect the sequel to be the ultimate first-person shooter.

Levi wrote:I know right, I've played editor's choice games, they are usually really good. But I guess that's why its editor's choice.

And you know what, they actually said the storyline was good! I'm very happy about that. This review has made my day. All the things they criticized were things HVS will probably fix in TC 2.

Yes! (as Captain Falcon says it)

Lol'd at the "Yes!" XD

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:

Levi wrote:I know right, I've played editor's choice games, they are usually really good. But I guess that's why its editor's choice.

And you know what, they actually said the storyline was good! I'm very happy about that. This review has made my day. All the things they criticized were things HVS will probably fix in TC 2.

Yes! (as Captain Falcon says it)

Expect the sequel to be the ultimate first-person shooter.

Yeah, even better then The Grinder. But then again, the sequel might not come out for another 2-3 years. They still have The Grinder and Gladiator AD to finish.

Link wrote:

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:

Levi wrote:I know right, I've played editor's choice games, they are usually really good. But I guess that's why its editor's choice.

And you know what, they actually said the storyline was good! I'm very happy about that. This review has made my day. All the things they criticized were things HVS will probably fix in TC 2.

Yes! (as Captain Falcon says it)

Expect the sequel to be the ultimate first-person shooter.

Yeah, even better then The Grinder. But then again, the sequel might not come out for another 2-3 years. They still have The Grinder and Gladiator AD to finish.

I predict the game will start development on October, 2010 and finish for Haloween in 2012. Game will be anounnced on Q1 2011. Just an prediction.

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:

Link wrote:

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:

Levi wrote:I know right, I've played editor's choice games, they are usually really good. But I guess that's why its editor's choice.

And you know what, they actually said the storyline was good! I'm very happy about that. This review has made my day. All the things they criticized were things HVS will probably fix in TC 2.

Yes! (as Captain Falcon says it)

Expect the sequel to be the ultimate first-person shooter.

Yeah, even better then The Grinder. But then again, the sequel might not come out for another 2-3 years. They still have The Grinder and Gladiator AD to finish.

I predict the game will start development on October, 2010 and finish for Haloween in 2012. Game will be anounnced on Q1 2009. Just an prediction.

I think you meant Q1 2010.

Although theres no way to tell yet, readers review was a 9.3 which in my opinion was pretty accurate,

Drakose123 wrote:Although theres no way to tell yet, readers review was a 9.3 which in my opinion was pretty accurate,

Yes, but those were either people really hyped up or flamers.

Link wrote:

Drakose123 wrote:Although theres no way to tell yet, readers review was a 9.3 which in my opinion was pretty accurate,

Yes, but those were either people really hyped up or flamers.

And the game just came out!

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:

Link wrote:

Drakose123 wrote:Although theres no way to tell yet, readers review was a 9.3 which in my opinion was pretty accurate,

Yes, but those were either people really hyped up or flamers.

And the game just came out!

If you actually look further into the reviews there's a flamer who rated it 0.0

A lot of people counter acted though and rated it ten.

I dont care for review scores, Im my only reviewer, and thats it xP

zelda_master_timmy wrote:I dont care for review scores, Im my only reviewer, and thats it xP

That works too.

zelda_master_timmy wrote:I dont care for review scores, Im my only reviewer, and thats it xP

So independent, aren't we? I guess that makes sense though. I have thought some games to be awesome, but receive mediocre scores. For example, Luigi's Mansion, that game was so cool and the storyline and concepts were pretty original. It was just fun to play as Luigi through a full 3d adventure.

It's fine how it is.

I changed my vote, I now think it should have scored a bit lower, idk, I'm ambivalent towards this game now because I am constantly comparing it to the Halo series, and I should stop.

Levi wrote:I changed my vote, I now think it should have scored a bit lower, idk, I'm ambivalent towards this game now because I am constantly comparing it to the Halo series, and I should stop.

8.4?

Neoxon wrote:

Levi wrote:I changed my vote, I now think it should have scored a bit lower, idk, I'm ambivalent towards this game now because I am constantly comparing it to the Halo series, and I should stop.

8.4?

These are the type of posts that I hate. This is a prime example of a too short post, WTH, is 8.4 supposed to mean? Explain D*mn it!

Levi wrote:

Neoxon wrote:

Levi wrote:I changed my vote, I now think it should have scored a bit lower, idk, I'm ambivalent towards this game now because I am constantly comparing it to the Halo series, and I should stop.

8.4?

These are the type of posts that I hate. This is a prime example of a too short post, WTH, is 8.4 supposed to mean? Explain D*mn it!

I mean do you mean The Conduit deserved an 8.4? Sorry about it not being too short.

Oh, lol, sorry for acting harsh earlier, it was all in good cheer.

And I'm not even sure about an 8.4 anymore, perhaps lower. I think the major thing that is preventing me from ditching the conduit is that it's the best shooter on wii, its controls, and the carbonizer XD.

Well, now that I've played the game, I would give it a little lower of a score. However, just a little worse then a 8.6. Look forward to my review of The Conduit!